作 者: (陈顺祥);
机构地区: 湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105
出 处: 《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第4期68-72,共5页
摘 要: 环境权作为第三代人权,一经提出便与南非环境问题建立了紧密联系。随着南非司法制度的日臻完善,司法救济作为权利救济的核心,在南非环境权司法实践中发挥着不可磨灭的作用。海尔矿业公司案作为一个宪法法院经典判例,通过对环境程序性权利的救济,不仅有效地处理了历史遗留的土地所有权问题,解决了当下的环境权侵害问题,而且有效地推动了环境保护理念的传播。此判例对于国内环境问题的解决具有极大的借鉴意义。 The environmental right,as the third generation of human rights,is closely related to environmental problems in South Africa.With the improvement of the judicial system in South Africa,as the core of right relief,judicial relief plays an indelible role in the judicial practice of the environmental right in South Africa.The case of Bengwenyama Minerals as a classic one of the Constitutional Court,through the relief of the environmental procedural right,not only effectively deals with the historical dispute on the land ownership and solves the current problem of the infringement of the environmental right,but promotes the spread of the concept of environmental protection as well.The case offers an implication to the solution of environmental problems in China.