作　　者： (万夏）; (李焕庭）;

机构地区： 四川警察学院,四川泸州646000

出　　处： 《四川警察学院学报》 2017年第3期40-46,共7页

摘　　要： 刑期折抵作为我国法律明确规定的一项制度,对于因未决羁押而被牺牲的实体权利提供了一个有效的救济途径。我国《刑法》和2012年《刑事诉讼法》对此均有明确规定。从字面上看,法律仅允许了管制、拘役和有期徒刑这三种自由刑的刑期折抵,对于死缓、无期徒刑减为有期徒刑后是否适用刑期折抵却没有规定,司法实务中也秉持不予折抵的态度,理论界对此则存在争议。其实,不管是对司法实务的总结,还是对现有法律的理解,又或是从理论层面的分析,都不难发现司法实践中不予折抵做法的不合理性。应透析司法现状的弊端,检思制度,查找法律的漏洞,探讨允许折抵的理论基石,提出行之有效的解决途径。 As a system stipulated explicitly in Chinese law, penalty term subtraction provides an effective way to re- lieve the entity right, which are clearly defined in Criminal Law and Criminal Procedural Law （2012）. Literally, three free penalties including controls, criminal detention or fixed-term imprisonment sentences are allowed to be converted into payment according to law. But there is no regulation about whether fixed-term imprisonment subtracted from death sentence with reprieve and life imprisonment can be converted into payment, and the conversion is not implemented in judicial practice, which arouses disputes in theorists. The fact is irrational. The disadvantages of the judicial status quo should be discussed, the mechanism should be inspected and reflected, legal loopholes should be found and the theory cornerstone of allowing discounts should be explored to put forward effective solutions.

关 键 词： 刑期折抵 死缓 无期徒刑 缺陷 完善