作　　者： (韦稼霖）;

机构地区： 国家知识产权局,北京100088

出　　处： 《菏泽学院学报》 2017年第4期68-73,共6页

摘　　要： 专利权范围的界定是专利制度的基础性问题,目前来看,关于专利权界定存在两种价值取向,一为追求权利的确定性,尊重权利的外在表现形式;一为追求发明的实质价值,尊重权利表象背后创新贡献。两种方向背道而驰,一个体现刚性,一个体现弹性,这种博弈使专利权范围界定的原则不甚清晰。本文尝试以体系化的眼光看待专利权界定的问题,通过私权体系视角下专利权与物权、债权、著作权以及商标权的比较分析,认为专利权界定应当更为尊重权利的外在表现形式,注重专利系统对稳定、安全、可预期性的价值需求,铸造创新的稳固根基。 The definition of patent scope is the basic item of patent system,which has two kinds of value orientation at present. One is to stress the external manifestations of rights based on certainty,the other is to stress the creative contribution behind the appearance of rights based on the real value of invention. The two are opposite to each other; one embodies rigidity while the other embodies elasticity,which makes the definition principles unclear. This paper attempts to take systematic view over the definition problem to compare and analyze patent right,property right,obligatory right,copyright and trademark right from the perspective of private rights system. The definition of patent should pay more attention to the external manifestations of rights stability,safety and predictable value requirements to lay a solid foundation for innovation.

关 键 词： 专利权 范围界定 比较分析 价值取向