作　　者： (欧阳新）;

机构地区： 中央财经大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处： 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2017年第4期12-18,共7页

摘　　要： 作为国际社会负责解决投资者与东道国之间投资纠纷的专门机制,ICSID仲裁长久以来面临着包括裁决不一致、忽略东道国主权、仲裁员不独立和透明度缺失等问题在内的正当性质疑。欧盟针对此倡导设立国际投资法庭体系,该体系内含上诉机制,明确规定东道国的规制权,设立高标准的法官行为准则和透明度要求,与现存ICSID机制所强调的一裁终局、投资者保护、仲裁程序保密性等存在巨大差异。通过对投资仲裁与新设投资法庭制度的比较分析,为中国将来在缔结中欧投资条约时就投资争端解决机制方面的谈判提出建议。 As a special mechanism for the international community to deal with investment disputes between investors and host states,ICSID arbitration has long been questioned about its legitimacy.The EU has established an international investment court system,which contains an appeal mechanism that clearly stipulated right of regulation of the host states,a high standard of judge＇s code of conduct and transparency requirements.As the ICSID mechanism emphasizes investor protection and arbitration procedure Confidentiality,there is a huge difference between EU proposal and ISCID mechanism.This article gives suggestions on the future investment treaty negotiation of China and EU through the comparative analysis of investment arbitration and new investment court system.

关 键 词： 仲裁 正当性危机 投资法庭体系