作　　者： (邹立君）;

机构地区： 南京大学法学院

出　　处： 《法制与社会发展》 2017年第5期74-86,共13页

摘　　要： 程序法理学关注的核心问题是,各项制度是否都拥有特定的权能领域,特定的任务能否被分配给某一制度而无需考虑其所包含的实质政策,某一制度所具有的特殊权能与怎样的特定程序相适应。在程序法理学的思想脉络之中,这一问题牵涉到司法与理性、司法与意志等论题,并经由"司法权能"这一特定概念表达出来,且具体化为"理性阐释"这样的程序性约束,从而勾勒出程序法理学的独特司法图景。在这种司法图景下,法官必须尊重其他制度的权能并且在"法治"的框架下来说明他们的决定;更重要的是,规范法官裁决的关键就在于如何确立与确立什么样的程序性权能,而非只依赖于实质性追责规定。 The main concern of process jurisprudence is whether each institution of government has specific areas of competence, whether a particular task can be assigned to some institution without consider- ing the substantive policy it contains, and what kind of specific procedurescan be adapted to the special competence of some institution. In the thought context of process jurisprudence, this issue involves sometopics on justice and reason as well as justice and will. It is expressed bythe particular concept of ＂ju- dicial competence＂, embodied as a procedural constraint such as ＂reasoned elaboration＂, and thus sketchs out the unique judicial picture of process jurisprudence. Under this judicial picture, judges must respect the competence of other institutions, and explain their decisions in the framework of the rule of law. More im- portantly, the key to regulating judge＇s decision is how to establish procedural competence and what kind of competence we should establish, rather thanrelying solely on substantive accountability.

关 键 词： 司法权能 理性阐释 程序性思维