作　　者： (熊征）;

机构地区： 西北师范大学法学院,兰州730070

出　　处： 《北京社会科学》 2017年第9期61-68,共8页

摘　　要： 司法谋求在"大调解"中的主导地位,是为履行政治职能、提升司法"治权"及保障部门自身利益的需要。在权力的单边治理中,由于与行政机关在资源掌控与分配上的体制性不平衡,司法主导性停留在诉求层面,司法的实践形态与其官方表达相背离。诉诸"能动司法",亦无法解决表达与实践相分离的矛盾状态。这种矛盾的结合是当下中国司法参与社会运动式治理的根本特色。 For better fulfilling the duty of political attributes, enhancing the ability of settling disputes and safeguarding the interests of the judicial organ itself, the judicial organ try hard to achieve the leading place in “ Grand Mediation”. Under the context of power-oriented administration and due to the huge gap comparing with the executive branches in possessing the resources of disputes settlement, the appeal to lead grand mediation can hardly be realized, which is described by the paper as the deviation of its practice from its expression. Even by resorting to judicial activism, the contradiction could not be resolved still. It reflects exactly the current situation of the courts in “ Campaign-style Governance” in China.

关 键 词： 大调解 司法 权力 实践 矛盾