作 者: (胡鸿杰);
机构地区: 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院,北京100086
出 处: 《档案学通讯》 2017年第5期14-19,共6页
摘 要: 学术著作对于学术研究至关重要,相对学术期刊而言,学术著作的评价亟待加强,但不应囿于"核心期刊—影响因子"的路径,有必要借鉴图书馆和出版界的经验,从包括内容、形态和效果等综合质量出发,建立学术著作评价的指标体系,进而完整、准确地反映学术著作水平。而《档案学经典著作(丛书)》的出版,正好为档案学术著作的评价研究提供范例和可能。 Academic books plays an important role instudies,whichis a little weak compared to journals in Academic Evaluation. Based on methods from the libraries and publishers instead ofthe way of "Core Journal - Impact Factor"only,it is necessary to set up anaccurate and complete evaluation index system for academicbooks including comprehensive qualities (content, form and effect etc.). And when aseries of Archival Classicshas been officially published, this makes a guide to the evaluation of academic books pos-sible.