作　　者： (张丙宣）;

机构地区： 浙江工商大学公共管理学院,杭州310018

出　　处： 《自然辩证法研究》 2017年第9期27-32,共6页

摘　　要： 技术在社会治理领域的广泛应用,增进了社会福祉,同时也潜藏着巨大的治理风险。本文从技术的双重互生的社会属性出发,认为技术的以生产和赋权特征为代表的仁慈面孔有助于增进社会福祉,同时,技术的以侵入和约束为特征的阴暗面孔使技术治理潜藏着系统的社会风险和政治风险,技术的短期跃进效应将长期固化体制的韧性,导致新的马太效应;为此,未来的技术治理首先应该是人本主义的、开放包容的,政府应该同时扮演好工程师和园丁的角色,构建由社会心理、社会信用、社会组织和社区构成的社会支撑体系,建立动态的多元合作的技术治理框架,从社会内部自发预防和消除技术治理的外部性。 The wide application of technology in the field of social governance can help to promote social welfare, but it also hides the huge risks. This paper, from the dual social properties of technology, argues that the benevolent face which is represented by the characteristics of production and empowerment of technology helps to improve public welfare. Invasion and restraint of the technocracy will bring the social and political risks, the short - term leap forward effect of technology will be undermine system resilience in long term, it will lead to the new Matthew effect. In the end, technocracy should be humanistic, open and inclusive, the government should also play a good role of ＇ engineers＇ and ＇gardener＇ , to build the social support system, and to establish the dynamic, multi - cooperative technocracy framework, to make the community spontaneous prevention and elimination of the externalities of technocracy.

关 键 词： 技术治理 社会建构论 风险