作　　者： (杨帆）;

机构地区： 吉林大学法学院/理论法学研究中心,长春130012

出　　处： 《南京大学法律评论》 2017年第1期3-17,共15页

摘　　要： 哈贝马斯的法律商谈理论以交往理性观念为基础,以平等参与的商谈民主政治为手段,为解决晚近资本主义社会的合法性危机提出了处方,是一种理想型的法哲学理论。与哈贝马斯的理论形成对比,在儒家思想影响下的传统中国社会的理性观念则强调：在承认参与者等级关系的基础上,以价值理性制约工具理性,进而达成和谐共识。在其影响之下,中国政法协商传统也与哈贝马斯的构想有相当差距,但是它的现实性一定程度上可以弥补哈贝马斯理论的理想主义缺陷,提供了另外一种规范的政法商谈进路。 On the basis of Communicative Rationality and by means of equally participant deliberative democracy, Habermas＇ Discourse Theory of Law had put forward anormative prescriptionfor the legitimacy crisis of modem society. Correspondingly, the Chinese Confucian view of rationality recognizes the power imbalance in political/legal life, but emphasizes the role of values, such as Zhongyong and Ren, to balance the individual desire and power. This paper analyzes and investigates the concept of Confucian Rationality,the public sphere and political/legal deliberative practices in traditional China under the influences of Confucianism. We argue that under the influences of Confucian Rationality, the Chinese political and legal deliberative traditions are unique from Habermas＇ suggestions. It may be another feasible path of deliberative politics which could make up for some defects of Habermas＇ theory.

关 键 词： 交往理性 儒家理性 公共领域 政治 法律协商