作 者: (刘涛);
机构地区: 天津商业大学法学院,天津300134
出 处: 《绵阳师范学院学报》 2017年第9期31-36,共6页
摘 要: 目前,国外一些发达国家的公司决议瑕疵非诉讼救济制度已经建立,其中主要包括全体股东事后"追认"决议、有瑕疵的公司决议被撤回、有瑕疵的公司决议被新决议所代替等三种公司决议瑕疵非诉讼救济方式。这些救济方式是公司自治原则和效率原则的深刻体现,而且与民法上的"撤回"和"追认"理论相契合。对于公司决议瑕疵纠纷而言,一些本可以通过私下谈判或者依据公司章程解决的决议瑕疵问题,如果通过司法诉讼途径解决不仅会造成司法资源的浪费,也会损害公司内部之间的团结。因此,除了运用诉讼手段解决公司决议瑕疵问题之外,亦不容忽视非诉讼救济手段的作用。 At present,the non-litigation relief system of defects in company resolution has been established in some foreign companies,which includes that all shareholders make the " recovery" resolution afterwards; flawed company resolution is withdrawn,flawed company resolution is replaced by a new resolution. This kind of relief is the embodiment of the principle of corporate autonomy and efficiency,which is in line with the theory of " withdrawal" and " pursuit" in civil law. Within the framework of a market economy,the penetration of public power should be considered. As for the flawed company's resolutions,some of the defects could have been negotiated or resolved in accordance with the principles of the company. It will not only cause the waste of judicial resources,but also do great damage to the unity within the company to solve the problem in a judicial way. Therefore,in addition to the use of litigation to resolve the defects in company resolution,the role of non-litigation relief means is also very important.