帮助 本站公告
您现在所在的位置:网站首页 > 知识中心 > 文献详情
文献详细Journal detailed

夹脊穴斜刺配合局部围刺治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛36例临床观察
Clinical observation of oblique insertion of needle to Jiaji points(Ex-B2) combined with local encircling needling in treating 36 cases of postherpetic neuralgia

作  者: (姜建芳);

机构地区: 河南中医药大学第一附属医院美容科,河南郑州450000

出  处: 《甘肃中医药大学学报》 2017年第4期67-70,共4页

摘  要: 目的观察夹脊穴斜刺配合局部围刺治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN)的临床疗效。方法将符合纳入标准的72例PHN患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,各36例。治疗组采用夹脊穴斜刺配合局部围刺治疗,对照组采用西药治疗,治疗1月后比较2组的临床疗效及视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分。结果治疗组总有效率为91.67%,对照组为72.22%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与同组治疗前比较,2组治疗后VAS评分显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且治疗组VAS评分的降低幅度显著大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论夹脊穴斜刺配合局部围刺治疗PHN临床疗效显著,值得临床进一步推广。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of oblique insertion of needle to Jiaji points (Ex-B2) combined with local encircling needling in treating postberpetic neuralgia (PHN). Methods 72 cases of PHN were randomized into treatment group and control group ,36 cases of each. The treatment group was intervened with oblique insertion of needle to Jiaji points (Ex-B2) combined with local encircling needling, while the control group was treated by western medicine therapy. Clinical efficacy and VAS score in two groups were compared after one month. Results The total effective rates of treatment group and control group were 91.67% and 72.22% respec- tively,the difference was significant (P〈0.05). After treatment, VAS scores of two groups reduced visibly, the difference was statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) , and the improvement of treatment group was superior to that of control group,there was a significant difference (P〈0.05). Conclusion The combined therapy is effective in treating PHN. It is worthy of promotion in clinic.

关 键 词: 带状疱疹后遗神经痛 围刺 夹脊穴 视觉模拟评分法 临床观察

相关作者

相关机构对象

相关领域作者

作者 庞菊香
作者 康秋实
作者 康超
作者 廖伟导
作者 廖刚