作　　者： ;

机构地区： 暨南大学新闻与传播学院

出　　处： 《南京社会科学》 2016年第5期91-99,共9页

摘　　要： 风险社会语境下,风险既是一种物,也是社会本身。风险分析离不开对社会结构与历史结构的总体性认知,而这同时指向了风险传播的元理论问题。当前,以不确定性为特征的风险文化主导了人们的物质实践,流动（flows）成为一种最基本的实践形态。分析主体的流动、风险的流动以及＂风险驱赶人＂的流动空间实践,不仅有助于识别和发现新的阶级形态,也有助于把握不平等性的生产机制与阶级特征。可见,风险问题本质上是一个阶级问题,可以借助马克思主义阶级分析方法来接近和把握风险社会的经济结构与生产模式,而当前＂生态马克思主义＂（Eco-Marxism）的兴起则进一步拓展了历史分析的阶级想象力。 In the age of risk society,risk not only refers to materialized objectives,but also the society itself. The risk analysis paradigm has to be based on the cognitive totality of both social and historical structures,involving meta-theory of risk communication at the same time. Under the social context of risk,the risk culture featuring uncertainty,as a matter of fact has been leading the way of flows. The flows of subjects and risks,along with the spatial practice of risk dispellers help to identify new forms of classes,and also to balance the unequal production mechanism and class characteristics based on risk-discourse-led material practice. Apparently,risk essentially is linked to class.Marxism class analysis can be used to explore risk forms and production modes of a risk society. The rise of Eco-Marxism surely is instrumental for us to legitimize and justify the method of class analysis.

关 键 词： 风险传播 元理论 空间正义 阶级分析 生态马克思主义 不确定性

分 类 号： [G206]

领　　域： []