作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学法学院

出　　处： 《北方法学》 2009年第2期 92-109,共18页

摘　　要： 诉讼模式的演变，揭示了审判对象只有在趋于理性的诉讼结构之中才可能获得合理而有效的规定。在相对合理的三角结构刑事诉讼中，没有起诉，就没有审判对象，审判对象与起诉范围保持同一性。辩护范围与审判对象具有同一性，审判对象集中展现于庭审，却规约着整个诉讼活动过程，审判对象与诉讼构造发生巧妙的相互规定、相互作用。寻求认识一种反思性的刑事诉讼，将侦查行为合法性问题自然纳入审判对象，显示了审判对象范畴在不断走向合理的诉讼构造中所表现出来的一种张力以及诉讼构造发展的方向。中国的刑事诉讼当务之急是要好好地运用审判对象在诉讼构造中生成与发生作用的原理，合理地改造我们的诉讼构造，有效规范审判对象存在与发生作用的程序问题。 The development of the litigation model indicates that only in a gradually rational litigation structure can the trial object be regulated in a rational and effective way. In the relatively rational triangle form of the criminal procedure, there is no trial object without a prosecution. Thus the object responds to the prosecution scope, so does it to the defence scope. Though the trial object mainly acts in the trial, it is crucial to the whole litigation. The trial object and the litigation structure are regulated interactively. Reflecting on the criminal procedure, the legality of criminal investigation should be integrated into the trial object, manifesting its function in the development of the rational litigation structure. As to the criminal procedure of China, it is urgent to well recognize the function of the trial object so as to reform the litigation structure and to effectively regulate procedures pertaining to the generating and functioning of the trial object.

关 键 词： 审判对象 诉讼构造 相对合理 相互规定

分 类 号： [D915.3 D925.2]

领　　域： [] []