导　　师： 李健男

学科专业： 030109

授予学位： 硕士

作　　者： ;

机构地区： 暨南大学

摘　　要： 推定信托英美法系衡平法下法官实现公平正义的工具,是当案件出于公平正义的目的需要施加一项信托而又没有既存的信托可采时,通过自由裁量强制设立的一种信托。推定信托是一种极富道德色彩的救济工具,英美法系的诸多判例不断地发展着推定信托,拓宽着其适用的范围,由传统的家庭关系延伸到了商业金融等领域。本文通过案例的方法来研究推定信托的性质,适用的基础以及具体的适用范围,以期对中国引入相关制度起到积极的影响。 本文第一部分介绍了推定信托产生的历史,适用的法理以及适用上的特点,论述了其性质上的实体性和救济性之争,并对两种认识做了比较分析。第二部分阐述了推定信托具体在民事婚姻家庭领域,商事领域以及刑事法律领域的适用。第三部分对比了推定信托与大陆法系的物权以及不当得利制度,得出结论,推定信托制度并不与大陆法系的制度有着不可调和的矛盾。最后阐述了引入推定信托制度对中国的意义,提出引入推定信托可以弥补损害赔偿上的缺陷,有利于完善我国的相关制度。 Constructive trust is one of very important tool in reaching justice on equity, When the facts of a case and the justice need a trust to be created,but there is no existing type of trusts could be applied,the court creates constructive trust.The constructive trusts is a tool of moral colors.The Anglo-American legal system has developed constructive trust through lots of cases in the history.The scope of its application has broaden,from the family proporty in tradition to the modern commercial area.This thesis is researching on the application of constructive trust by case method,major in its nature,the basic and material scope of its application.So as to making devotion to the introduction of constructive trust into Chinese law. The first part of the thesis is about the history of constructive trust and characteristic of the application,also compare the institution nature with the remedy. the second part of the thesis mainly talks about the material scope of its application,in the home property,the commercial area and the criminal cases.The third part deals with the difference between constructive trust and real right system, unjustified enrichment in civil law system,the conclusion is that constructive trust and unjustified enrichment have substantive similarity.The last part is about the signification of the introduction of constructive trust.In conclusion,the constructive trust can make up the insufficiency of compensation for injury,consummate the legal system correlatively.

关 键 词： 推定信托 适用基础 救济 不当得利

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]