导　　师： 徐瑄

学科专业： 030105

授予学位： 硕士

作　　者： ;

机构地区： 暨南大学

摘　　要： 知识产权侵权认定时应归入“过错责任”,还是“无过错责任”?中国知识产权相关法律并没有明文规定,学术界对此问题更是一直争论不休。因特网的形成、网络虚拟世界的出现给知识产权保护带来巨大的挑战,知识产权侵权问题呈现出了前所未有的复杂性和多样性,给知识产权基础理论提出了新问题的同时,也给立法和司法施加了沉重的压力。 在知识产权侵权归责制度中,何谓知识产权归责原则中的“责”?知识产权侵权与一般侵权之间是否存在差异?《民法通则》第一百零六条关于侵权归责原则的一般规定,对知识产权是否适用?这些问题,成为了影响我们对知识产权侵权归责原则作出判断的重要因素,是解决这一实践问题无可回避的基本前提。 笔者认为,现行关于知识产权侵权归责原则的讨论,常忽略了知识产权特性和侵权的特点,只笼统地认定是适用过错责任还是无过错责任原则。而针对知识产权侵权的司法实践,知识产权间接侵权问题早已是法官处理的侵权类型之一,但法律对此依旧是空白,本文把间接侵权问题引入,把知识产权侵权分类为直接侵权和间接侵权,以期对知识产权侵权类型具体问题具体分析,为知识产权侵权适用无过错责任提供另一种思考方式。 Which attributive principle should Intellectual Property Infringement choose, principle of no-fault liability or principle of fault liability? There is no clear legal provision in the codes of Intellectual Property,which arouse much controversy.The General Principle of Civil Law of the People's Republic of China has made the doctrine of liability for wrongs a clear legal provision,which is regarded as the general principle of liability fixation on tort in the civil law.Therefore,some scholars consider it as the attributive principle for Intellectual Property Infringement,but this opinion brought much disputes in the past ten years. The development of information technology and internet technology considerably change the whole environment of the Intellectual Property and the bring out many problems to the protection of Intellectual Property,making the Intellectual Property Infringement more and more complex,which put forward new questions to the foundation of Intellectual Property.Facing the question of liability fixation of Intellectual Property infringement,we firstly should comprehend the meaning of liability in the Intellectual Property infringement area and make clear the difference significations between infringement and tort.Only in this way can we judge whether principle of liability fixation in The General Principle of Civil Law of the People's Republic of China suit for Intellectual Property. The theme of this study is to discuss the shortages of the argumentations about this question.Basing on the characteristic of Intellectual Property and infringement, this study tries to introduce direct infringement and indirect infringement to settle this problem.So that,there is another way to explain the allegation of no-fault liability of Intellectual Property infringement.

关 键 词： 知识产权 无过错责任原则 直接侵权 间接侵权

分 类 号： [D923.4]

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]