导　　师： 李健男

学科专业： 0301

授予学位： 硕士

作　　者： ;

机构地区： 暨南大学

摘　　要： 《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第四条是关于“直接适用的法”的法律规定，虽然他们施行的时间尚短，但是在法律适用的过程中已经出现了不少的问题，这些问题主要有：一、第四条的性质不明确；二、第四条中“强制性规定”的性质被理解错误；三、司法实践与学界对于第四条中“强制性规定”的范围观点存在分歧；四、缺少判断哪些法律规范属于第四条中“强制性规定”的标准。 在《司法解释（一）》出台后，其第十条对《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第四条起到了一定的解释作用，其作用主要体现在：一、明确了第四条中“强制性规定”的定义；二、明确了第四条中“强制性规定”的范围；三、提供了判断哪些法律规范属于第四条中“强制性规定”的标准，并提供了参考的适用范围。但《司法解释（一）》第十条虽然对第四条的内容进行了完善，但其也产生了以下问题：一、引入了“社会公共利益”作为标准导致了与其他法条产生适用的混乱；二、导致《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第四条与第四十三条产生适用的混乱。 针对以上问题所提出的建议是：一、明确第四条的性质；二、缩小第四条中“强制性规定”的范围；三、建议删除《司法解释（一）》第十条中关于“社会公共利益”的表述；四、建议删除《司法解释（一）》第十条“涉及劳动者权益保护”一项。 The Article4of Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations is about'the Rules of Immediate Application'. Despite the Article4of Application of Law forForeign-related Civil Relations and its judicial interpretation have enforced just ashort period, they have been found many problems.These problems are: First, thenature of Article IV is not clear; Second, the 'mandatory provision' in article4wasmisinterpreted; Third, judicial practice and academia on the 'mandatory provisions'of Article4range view differences; Fourth, lacking of criteria to determine whichlegal norms belong to 'mandatory provisions' in Article4. After the 'judicial interpretation /(a/)' introduced, its Article10play a role in theinterpretation of the Article4of Application of Law for Foreign-related CivilRelations. Its role is mainly reflected in: First, give a clear definition of 'mandatoryprovisions' in Article4.Second, clear the 'mandatory provisions' of Article IV range.Third, provide the legal norms standard to determine what belongs to the 'mandatoryprovisions' of Article4and provide scope reference. Although the 'judicialinterpretation /(a/)' Article10perfected Article4. But it also produces followingquestions: First，introduce the “public interest” as a standard led to other methods ofgenerating confusion. Second, the 'judicial interpretation /(a/)' Article10lead toArticle4and Article43of Application of Law for Foreign-related CivilRelationsapplies generate confusion. To solve the above problem, give the following suggestions: First, clear thenature of Article4. Second, narrow the 'mandatory provisions' of the scope of Article4. Third, delete 'the public interest” of judicial interpretation /(a/) in Article10; Fourth,delete “involving the protection of workers' rights” in Article10of judicialinterpretation /(a/).

关 键 词： 涉外民事关系法律适用法 第四条 直接适用的法

分 类 号： [D997]

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]