导　　师： 蔡红

学科专业： 030109

授予学位： 硕士

作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东外语外贸大学

摘　　要： 随着中欧贸易的深入发展，欧盟对华贸易救济调查呈现越演越烈的趋势，已经对从中国进口的多种产品采取反补贴措施，例如欧盟对华铜版纸、有机涂层钢板、光伏产品、太阳能玻璃等产品进行了双反贸易救济调查（反倾销、反补贴调查）。欧盟理事会（Council of the European Union）于2011年5月6日对华铜版纸反补贴调查案做出终裁，裁定对铜版纸产品征收高额的反补贴税；于2013年3月11日对华有机涂层钢板反补贴调查案做出终裁，裁定征收高额反补贴税。从我国被调查的出口产品的情况看，调查所涉及企业众多，贸易额巨大。欧盟作为我国主要出口市场，对其反补贴法的专向性标准的研究具有重大的理论与现实 意义。本文共分为四章：第一章为反补贴法的专向性标准的概念与历史由来。介绍了反补贴法的专向性标准的起源与发展，尤其是美国反补贴法的专向性标准的发展历程。并以美国 实践重点分析法律专向性与事实专向性的关系。第二章为欧盟反补贴基础条例的专向性标准。对四个专向性标准进行了系统的分析，认为欧盟反补贴法的四个专向性标准围绕法律政策、补贴实践、区域补贴政策和进出口贸易的禁止性补贴四个方面，体现了欧盟法的专向性标准逻辑严 密、能适应补贴政策纷繁多变的特点。第三章以欧盟对华铜版纸、有机涂层钢板反补贴调查案为例，对欧盟专向性标准的法律适用问题分析总结。裁决中反映出我国在许多领域存在专向性补贴的现象。欧盟对华反补贴调查结果反映出：专向性补贴影响我国市场经济的发展， 尤其是市场主体歧视、生产要素的行政干预等方面问题显著。第四章是基于欧盟对华反补贴裁决中的补贴政策问题，主要围绕我国的市场经济问题进行法律政策阐述。主要包括：我国市场经济问题的由来、行政干预对市场的影响、在生产要素市场需要完善价格机制等。本文重点分析了土地交易市场、公共企业服务、商业银行、税收政策和区域发展政策等五个在欧盟对华反补贴调查中容易被认定为构成专向性补贴的重要领域，继而提出完善要素市场价格机制的法律策略等。 With the rapid development of China-EU trade, the trend that the EU's traderemedy investigations increasesdramatically and China economic had suffered fromsuch kind of trade disputes. There are many products which had been investigated inboth anti-dumping investigation and anti-subsidy investigation by EU authorities,such as coated fine paper /(also named art paper/), organic coated steel products, solarglass products and crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key parts. TheCouncil of the European Union decided the council implementing regulation /(EU/) No452//2011in6May2011to imposing a definitive anti-subsidy duty on imports ofcoated fine paper originating in the People’s Republic of China, and No215//2013in11March2013to imposing a countervailing duty on imports of certain organic coatedsteel products originating in the People’s Republic of China. From our survey on theexport situation, these investigations involve a large number of enterprises and hugetrade volume.The European Union is the main export market for China enterprises; asa result it is of great importance to focus my paper on the subsidy specificitystandards in EU anti-subsidy laws. The paper is separated into four parts as followed. Chapter1introduces the concept and the history of specificity standard inanti-subsidy laws. Mainly introduces the origin and development of the specificitystandard anti subsidy law, especially in USA anti-subsidy law and law enforcement.Finally, it displays that specific in law and specific in jure are in different situation. Chapter2discusses the specificity standards ofEU anti-subsidy basic regulation.After systematic analysis of the four standards, it is considered that the standards aredesigned to investigate on legal policy, subsidy practices, regional subsidies andprohibited subsidies. The specificity standards of EU laws are logic, and arefixable tothe changing situation of governmentsubsidies. Chapter3discusses the specificity standards within the council implementingregulations decided by the Council of EU, such as No452//2011and No215//2013.The two final decisions show that there are many specific subsidies founded in manyareas.Investigations have revealed that specific subsidies had affected our marketeconomy, especially the discrimination between the state-owned or controlledcorporates and private corporates, and the government intervention in market ofproduction factor. Chapter4aims at the realistic significance by discussing market economy and its legal strategies basing on the final decisions of EU council. For example, the origin ofChina's market economy problem, influence of administrative intervention onmarket,the need to promote price mechanism in the production elements market andso on. Most importantly, the paper analyses the key areas which considered beingspecific subsidies in the EU anti-subsidies investigations, such as the land transactionmarket, public enterprise service, commercial bank, tax policy, regional developmentpolicy. After the analysis upwards, there are some improving legal strategies.

关 键 词： 欧盟 反补贴 专向性标准 补贴政策 市场经济

分 类 号： [D996.1]

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律] [政治法律]