导　　师： 邓成明

学科专业： 030101

授予学位： 硕士

作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广州大学

摘　　要： 关于立法宗旨的定位问题，在《劳动合同法》起草之初就颇富争议，先后历经四次修改，直至《劳动合同法》实施之后，围绕立法宗旨的有关争论依然没有平息，反而有愈演愈烈之势，这充分说明我们有必要结合《劳动合同法》的立法过程、实施效果及其背后复杂的利益博弈，重新对《劳动合同法》的立法宗旨有关争论进行再反思。在《劳动合同法》立法过程中，关于立法宗旨一直存在着“单保护”/(保护劳动者的合法权益/)与“双保护”/(保护劳动者和用人单位的合法权益/)的争论。在经济不景气的全球大环境影响之下，有关《劳动合同法》的讨论，越来越走向极端并出现政治化的趋势—“拥护”与“反对”的双方，被简单划分成“劳方代言人”与“资方代言人”，正常的利益权衡也变成了“政治方向是否正确”的鲜明旗帜。这种错误倾向容易加剧现实社会中的劳资矛盾，以及由此带来的一系列社会问题，终将背离构建和发展和谐稳定的劳动关系的立法初衷。其实，隐藏在“单保护”与“双保护”争论背后的，实质是怎样立法才更能维护“公平正义”这一立法的基本目标，更好地解决劳动关系的双方当事人之间的权利义务的配置问题。在关注争论双方分歧的过程中，我们更应强调两者之间的共性—都是为了使法律得到更好的实施，两者之间的差别仅仅是方法不同，视角不同，立场与目的其实都是一致的。只有承认这一点，我们才有可能理性来看待这场争论，才有助于我们理解、认识《劳动合同法》，有助于我们更好地运用《劳动合同法》。 Positioning on the legislative purpose in the beginning of the drafting of the'Employment Contracts Law' most disputed, has gone through four changes, until after theimplementation of the 'Employment Contracts Law', around the legislative purpose of thedebate is still not subsided, but growing,potential, which fully shows that we need to'Employment Contracts Law' in the legislative process, the implementation of the effect andits underlying complexity of the interests of the game, re-re-reflection of the controversy ofthe legislative purpose of the Employment Contracts Law. There has been a single protection'/(protection of laborers' legitimate rights and interests/) and' dual protection '/(protection ofworkers and employers the legitimate rights and interests/) debate on the legislative purpose inthe legislative process of the' Employment Contracts Law '. Economic downturn in theglobal environment under the influence of the discussion of the 'Employment ContractsLaw' is more and more extreme and political trend-the 'support' and 'oppose' the two sides,is simply divided into labor spokesperson,'and' employers advocate 'for the normaltrade-offs into a' correct political orientation 'distinctive banner. This erroneous tendency toeasily exacerbate the social reality in the labor-management conflicts, and the resulting socialproblems will eventually deviate from the original intention to build and develop harmoniousand stable labor relations legislation. In fact, hidden in the 'single protection' and'protection' argument behind the essence of how legislation can be able to maintain the'fairness and justice,' the basic objective of this legislation to better address the rights andobligations of labor relations between the parties configuration problems. Concerned aboutthe controversy differences between the two sides of the process, we should emphasize thecommonalities between the two-in order to make the law better implementation of thedifference between the two are just different methods, different angle, position a

关 键 词： 劳动合同法 立法宗旨 立法 倾斜保护 适度

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]