导 师: 蔡笑岳
学科专业: 040203
授予学位: 硕士
作 者: ;
机构地区: 广州大学
摘 要: 攻击行为是日常生活中常见的一种社会现象,也是心理学研究中的一个重要领域。近年来随着学习工作压力的不断增大,大学生群体中常常发生暴力攻击事件,引起了强烈的社会反响,因此本研究的目的是希望通过研究大学生的攻击行为,为大学生攻击行为的干预提供一些帮助。 攻击行为作为一种有目的伤害他人的行为,存在多种形式,并且也与许多因素有关。社会智力作为人们在社会适应和发展过程中表现出来的一种能力,无论是对社会信息的加工还是社会行为的表现都起着重要影响。攻击行为作为一种社会行为,必定与社会智力之间存在某种关系。在本研究中,希望通过对大学生社会智力与攻击行为关系的探讨,来揭示两者之间的规律。 本研究分为两个部分。第一部分研究的是大学生社会智力与外显攻击行为之间的关系。选取了483名大学生被试,采用问卷调查法,使用的研究工具为大学生社会智力问卷和攻击行为问卷。第二部分研究的是大学生社会智力与内隐攻击性之间的关系。研究方法为内隐联想测验,被试为问卷调查结果中所划分的高社会智力组大学生和低社会智力组大学生。通过实验来探讨不同社会智力组大学生之间内隐攻击性是否存在显著差异。 本研究结果如下: (1)有超过2//3的受调查大学生存在中等程度以上的外部攻击行为,性别、是否学生干部、是否独生子女等背景因素对大学生外部攻击行为有不同程度的影响。 (2)大学生社会智力与大学生的外部攻击行为有显著的负相关关系,社会智力越高,其在解决冲突矛盾时发生攻击行为的倾向性越低。大学生社会智力对攻击行为有预测作用。 (3)大学生社会智力各因子与外部攻击行为各因子之间存在不同程度的负相关关系,社会成熟度与社会认知对外部攻击行为有预测作用。 (4)大学生群体存在攻击性的内隐认知系统,且这种内隐攻击倾向不受性别因素的影响。 (5)大学生社会智力与内隐攻击性之间不存在显著相关,只有其社会认知因子与内隐攻击性之间存在显著负相关。不同社会智力组大学生之间内隐攻击性也不存在显著差异。 Aggressive behavior is common in everyday life as a social phenomenon, whichis that psychologists concerned about the important areas. In recent years, with studyand work pressure increasing, college students often violent attacks, causing strongsocial repercussions. The purpose of this study is to provide help to the research ofaggressive behavior and aggressive behavior intervention. As a purpose to harm other people, aggressive behavior has various forms, andalso relates to many factors. Social intelligence as the people shown the ability ofsocial adaptation and the development process, whether it is the performance of socialinformation processing or social behavior plays an important influence. As a socialbehavior, aggressive behavior, must be a relationship between social intelligence. Inthis study, we explored the relationship between students' social intelligence andaggression, to reveal the law between the two. There are two parts in this research. The first part of the study is the relationshipbetween college students ' social intelligence and explicit attacks. We selected483university students and used the questionnaire method with college students’ socialintelligence and aggression questionnaire. The second part of the study is therelationship between college students ' social intelligence and implicit Aggression.Experimental subject was divided by the survey results of high social intelligencegroup of college students and low social intelligence group of college students. Byusing IAT, we investigated whether there are different implicit aggression betweenhigh and low social intelligence group of college students. Results of this study are as follows: /(1/) Over2//3of college students in this study showed aggressive behaviors overmedium level. Gender, student leaders, the one-child and other background factors ofcollege students had varying degrees of impact.on the external aggressive behavior. /(2/) There was significant negative correlation between college students' socialintelligence and aggression. The higher the social intelligence was, the lower itstendency to aggressive behavior occurs in resolving the conflicts was. Social intelligence of college students can predict aggressive behavior. /(3/) There are varying degrees of negative correlation between each factor of theStudents' Social intelligence and Aggression Questionnaire. Social maturity andSocial cognitive can predict aggressive behavior. /(4/) There was implicit aggressive cognitive system in college students, and thisimplicit aggressive tendencies were not affected by gender factors. /(5/) There was no significant correlation exists between social intelligence and theimplicit aggression of college students, but the social cognitive factors and theimplicit aggression had a significant negative correlation. there was no significantdifference between the different social intelligence group of college students and theirimplicit aggression.
关 键 词: 大学生 社会智力 攻击行为 内隐攻击性 内隐联想测验
分 类 号: [B844.2]