作　　者： ;

机构地区： 云南师范大学

出　　处： 《佳木斯大学社会科学学报》 2004年第2期101-103,共3页

摘　　要： 三个古国早已发现 :“自涉加否定”(P)偶发的“矛盾性” ;随后其一又把P“强化”为“本语句假”(Q) ,响应“亦此亦彼”悖论 (R) ,携手挑战“不矛盾律”。这两个“悖论之冠” :Q、R ,迄今仍然“扑朔迷离” ,被誉为“千古之谜”。在 2 0世纪初 ,由于“罗素悖论”的猛烈冲击 ,惊醒了沉睡数世纪的Q、R ,即时引发西方众多“今哲”奋力解悖。“今哲”经历百年挫败 ,在迷惘和绝望之余 ,竟然认Q为“无意义”而拒斥Q为“矛盾” ,比“古哲”倒退了一大步 ! Early in the three ancient countries, it had been discovered that “self-reference plus negation” may generate contradiction (P). Later one of them strengthened P as “this sentence is false”(Q), responding to “this and that” paradox (R), thus Q and R together challenging the law of non-contradiction. Q and R, the two “champion paradoxes”, are now still unsolvable and are regarded as “thousand - year riddles”. In the early 20th century,the heavy impact of Russell paradox wakened up Q and R which had slept for several centuries;many western paradox researchers strove to resolve them but failed. Hopeless and perplexed, they regard Q as “meaningless” instead of “contradictory”, which is a great “regress”to the “ancient researchers”!

关 键 词： 不当排斥 谬误 隐蔽的否定 自涉悖论 谎者 的相容歧解 古哲 墨子 自语相违 维特根斯坦 斯各特定理

领　　域： [哲学宗教]