作　　者： ;

机构地区： 四川大学法学院

出　　处： 《江西公安专科学校学报》 2004年第2期40-44,共5页

摘　　要： 传统共同被告理论仅以程序法为划分依据,理论上没有揭示共同被告的实质性联系,导致实践中对共同被告口供的不正确适用。从证据法上讲,可将共同被告分为实质的共同被告和形式的共同被告。实质的共同被告包括同案处理和非同案处理的共犯、牵连犯,他们的供述应作为被告口供处理,当前的司法解释将其作为证人证言是不妥当的。但同时对“不得仅以被告口供定案的原则”应予以松动,允许在一定条件下可根据被告口供对整个案件或部分案件事实予以认定。形式的共同被告供述可作为证人证言处理。 the theory of traditional codefendant is constructed according to procedural law. It doesn't reveal substantial relation between codefendants and it leads to wrong application of confession of codefendant. According to substantive law and procedural law, the article divided codefendants into substantive codefendant and formal codefendant. The codefendants includes accomplice who is handled in same procedure or in different procedure, and implicated offender The confession of codefendant shall be regarded as confession of defendant. So, in the current judicial interpretation, the confession of codefendant is regarded as witness' testimony, which is wrong. At the same time, the principle that a defendant cannot be found guilty and sentenced to a criminal punishment if there is only statement but no evidence shall be amended to a certain extent. In some situations, the whole case facts or part facts can be defined only by confession of defendant. The confession of formal codefendant shall be regarded as witness' testimony

关 键 词： 共同被告 口供 被告

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]