作　　者： ;

机构地区： 华南师范大学教育科学学院心理应用研究中心

出　　处： 《心理学报》 2004年第2期247-252,共6页

摘　　要： 对Ross1987年与 1989年关于样例表面概貌影响原理通达与原理运用的两项研究以及莫雷 2 0 0 0年针对Ross关于“表面概貌不影响原理运用”的结论所进行的研究进行了分析 ,然后指出 ,莫雷 2 0 0 0年根据对Ross的研究结论的质疑所做的研究是逻辑严密的 ,根据莫雷的实验设计及结果 ,可以得出“表面概貌影响原理运用”的结论。邵文对莫雷的研究的质疑 ,首先是由于对心理学因果研究的基本设计逻辑不了解 ,同时也由于对莫雷的实验逻辑不理解 ,其批评是难以成立的。 This paper analyzed the two researches made by Ross on the influence of superficial similarities between examples and test items both on the access and the use of principles and the research made by Mo Lei in 2000 which turned down the conclusion made by Ross that superficial story line had no influence on the use of principle. It was pointed out that the research made by Mo in 2000 had thorough foundation. According to the design and the results of Mo's experiment, it could be concluded logically that the superficial story line could influence the use of principles. It was just because the author didn't know the basic design logic of psychological experiment and didn't comprehend the design logic of Mo's experiment that the paper by Shao Guanghua raised the criticism of Mo's research. This criticism was groundless.

关 键 词： 样例 表面概貌 原理运用 原理通达

领　　域： [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教] [文化科学] [文化科学]