机构地区: 浙江师范大学教育科学与技术学院
出 处: 《课程.教材.教法》 2004年第2期19-23,共5页
摘 要: 运用跨文化的视野来审视和比较课程概念,东方学者将课程诠解为学科的教学计划和教学内容、教学知识等,并着眼于分科课程、学科课程、显性课程和必修课程的建设,尤强调课程的社会功用;西方学者则将课程定义为知识、经验、活动及三者的统一,并侧重于活动课程、综合课程、隐性课程和选修课程等的架构,且一贯注重课程对个体成长和发展的促进功能。 When examining and comparing the concept of curriculum from the view of cross-culture , the scholars of the east tend to interpret it as teaching plans and teaching contents of subject, and focus on divided curriculum, disciplinary curriculum, dominant curriculum and compulsory curriculum, and lay great emphasis on the social function of the curriculum. The scholars in the west , however , regard curriculum as knowledge, experience and activity and the unity of them, and pay great attention on the construction of the curriculum of activity , integrated curriculum , hidden curriculum and selective curriculum while attach more importance on the growth and development of the individuals.