作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学人文科学学院历史系

出　　处： 《中山大学学报（社会科学版）》 2003年第5期64-70,共7页

摘　　要： 魏晋才性同异离合之论是玄学清谈的重要命题,其论的具体政治背景,与汉末以来士之性行与才能是否为一,以及魏创九品中正制以来对人才的乡里评议与台阁授官能否分离这两大问题密切相关。正始中夏侯玄从政治操作层面,维护台阁铨衡用人之权,分别“上之分”与“下之叙”,主张任用考察士人时应对才能与德行“明其分叙”。两者前为“事理”,后为“人心”。在才性关系上既主才性离,又承认才性同,视才性的同异离合为相反而相成。体现了正始玄学家糅合儒道,打通天人的哲学努力,是正始玄学“名教出于自然”思想在才性论上的体现。 The Cai Xing Si Ben (才性四本) had been in an important proposition of the metaphysical philosophy in the Wei and Jin Dynasties. During the Zheng-Shi (正始) period, Xia Hou-xuan (夏侯玄) maintained that the difference between ability and virtue should be made when the government appointed and examined the officials. Moreover, he believed the ability and the virtue were opposite to each other but at the same time they were complementary. All discussions on the proposition in this period embodied the efforts to combine Confucianism with Taoism, and reflected the philosophical thoughts of 'Ming Jiao (名教) is from Zi Ran (自然)'.

关 键 词： 魏晋 才性四本 夏侯玄 才性同异离合 选举 分叙

领　　域： [历史地理] [历史地理]