作 者: ;
机构地区: 中山大学人文科学学院哲学系
出 处: 《中山大学研究生学刊(社会科学版)》 2003年第3期1-7,共7页
摘 要: 本文从朱熹、王阳明对《大学》八条目中的"格物致知"的不同注解的梳理分析,引出程朱理学与陆王心学的一些基本的不同之处,朱熹与王阳明对"物"与"格"的不同训解充分预示了他们的思想差异与分歧,本文从这一分歧入手概括性的对朱熹即物穷理与王阳明理在心中两种理学观念进行了比较。 In this artide, the different explainations of that 'the extension of knowledge lies in the inwestigation of things' in The Great Learning between Chu Hsi and Wang Yang-ming are analysed. From this, the difference of the school of Chu and the school of Wang was appeared. Theirdifierence of theories lies on their different explanation to' thing' and 'investigation' from which I compare synoplically the Chu Hsi' s theory of 'studying everything and finding out exhaustiwely its reason' with the Wang Yang-mings' s theory of ' the reason being in the heart'.