作　　者： ; ; (陈韵桥）;

机构地区： 华南师范大学外国语言文化学院

出　　处： 《外语艺术教育研究》 2016年第1期18-22,共5页

摘　　要： 语言测试的真实性体现为应有真实的指导语,能体现学生语言能力的任务及学生对其的主观认同感。学界对真实性的影响意见不一,部分学者认为真实性对学生产生积极影响,另一些则认为会产生负面干扰。国内外评价真实性的框架主要有三种。目前针对真实性的理论探讨较多,实证研究不足。现有的实证研究多属于大学层面,多从出题者角度出发,集中在笔试部分,建议今后可考察其他层面的测试如中学生的口语测试,从学习者和教学者等多角度出发,研究语言测试中的真实性。 Authenticity of language testing should include authentic instructions as well as reflect students’ language ability and students’ acceptance of the test. Researchers have different opinions on the effects of authenticity in language testing. Some believe that authenticity casts positive influences on students while others insist it could be a disturbance. There are three major frameworks that measure authenticity. The theoretical discussion about authenticity is far more than empirical studies. The existing empirical studies mostly analyze university written tests from the perspective of testers. In the future, the study of authenticity in language testing should be focused on other tests, for example, oral tests for high school students, and should be explored from the perspective of learners, teachers and other participants etc.

关 键 词： 真实性 语言测试 评价框架 实际应用

领　　域： [语言文字]