作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 南京大学新闻传播学院

出　　处： 《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 2016年第4期81-89,共9页

摘　　要： 文森特·莫斯可将制度主义、北美权力研究、英国批判社会学、文化帝国主义、文化产业批判等多种研究路径整合到同一个框架下,通过厘清传播政治经济学与文化研究的外部边界,将传播政治经济学建构为一门独立的"学科",但该"学科"既没有一致的逻辑基础,也没有明确的边界和外部构型,其实质是一种"神话"的建构。莫斯可建构该"神话"的原因在于应对美国国内对左翼学者的边缘化,并争取实现学科话语的主流化。然而莫斯可的学科建构一方面不能得到主流传播学界的认可,另一方面又约束了传播政治经济学的创造力,使其沦为一种保守主义的"技术决定论"。因此对传播政治经济学而言,学科化并不是当下最重要的问题,最重要的问题仍然是从传播这个视角切入,政治经济学可以帮助我们看到何种独特的景观。去学科化与直面快速变化的实践可能是传播政治经济学研究的唯一出路所在。 Vincent Mosco constructed the ＂Political Economy of Communication＂as an independent ＂discipline＂by integrating the research path of institutionalism,North American power research,British critical sociological research,and the ＂Cultural Imperialism＂to a united frame and by clarifying the boundary between the political economy and the cultural studies. But the ＂discipline＂lacks of not only the consistent logical basis,but also the clear outer structure. In consequence the substance of political economy of communication is myth. The Mosco＇s purpose is defending the oppression by American Government and pushing the discipline into mainstream of communication research. However,Mosco＇s construction on the one hand couldn＇t be acknowledged by mainstream communication research,on the other hand it restraints the political economy of communication＇s creativity,and makes itself a conservative ＂technicism＂. So for the political economy of communication,the most important issue is not＂disciplinization＂and the most important issue is what landscape we can discover through the political economy of communication＇s perspective. The only way for the political economy of communication is ＂non- disciplinization＂and facing the rapidly changing reality.

关 键 词： 传播政治经济学 合法性 学科 神话

领　　域： [文化科学]