作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 中山大学人文科学学院中国非物质文化遗产研究中心

出　　处： 《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2016年第4期64-71,共8页

摘　　要： 随着生产性方式保护的开展,传承主体的保护意识和文化自觉意识有所增强,相关企业获得了较明显的经济效益,其生存条件也得到改善,传承人的保护和培养得到进一步重视,参与者的转型和创新意识不断提高,市场开拓有新进展,在生产过程中适当的机械化有利于非遗的保护;与此同时,也存在着以下问题:保护对象有待进一步厘清,现代化生产对传统工艺有明显的冲击,原材料危机开始显现,优秀人才断层严重,政府缺乏具体有效措施,支持力度不够。尽管如此,无论从传统手工技艺类"非遗"的内在属性,还是其外在所处的生存现状,生产性保护都值得提倡;但是,生产性保护并不等同于产业化,并且需要妥善处理本真性、整体性、传承与创新等问题。 With the development of the productive protection of intangible cultural heritages, the protection awareness and culture consciousness has been enhanced among the bearing subjects; related enterprises have obtained obvious economic benefits with greatly improved conditions; much importance has been attached to the protection and cultivation of bearers; the transformation and innovation awareness of the participants keep being enhanced; market development has achieved new progress and proper mechanization in the production process has proven beneficial to the protection of intangible cultural heritages. At the same time, some problems occur： the objects of protection are to be further clarified; the modernized production has a significant impact on traditional technology; raw material crisis begins to emerge; the continuity of outstanding talent is faced with the threat of being broken; the government lacks specific and effective measures and gives insufficient support, Nevertheless, in terms of both the intrinsic attributes of the traditional craftsmanship as intangible cultural heritages and the external status they seem to be in, productive protection is worthy of promotion. However, productive protection should not be taken as industrialization. It is necessary to properly handle the matters of authenticity, integrity, inheritance and innovation, etc.

关 键 词： 非遗 生产性保护 传承人 核心技艺

领　　域： [经济管理] [社会学]