作　　者： ;

机构地区： 华南师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处： 《史学史研究》 2015年第3期84-91,共8页

摘　　要： 《弗莱德加编年史》(Chronicle of Fredegar)是中世纪早期法兰克国家核心历史文献之一。该书第四卷中的诸多材料在墨洛温王朝史研究领域具有孤证性,因此,对该书史料信度的判断也就成为一大难题。德国史家布鲁诺·克鲁什等人认为,该书由多人编写,其文本信度相对较高。法国史家费迪南·洛特等人认为,该书编写者只有一人,对其文本信度的估计不宜太高。另外,法国史家马塞尔·博多对该编年史的信度持高度乐观的态度,并对之作出颇具"浪漫"色彩的释读。结合其他相关材料可以看出,和中世纪西欧很多同类史书一样,《弗莱德加编年史》并不能算作完全的信史。不过,该书对于法兰克历史研究依然具有其不可替代的特殊价值。 Chronicle of Fredegar was one of the key documents appearing in the Frankish Kingdom in Early Medieval. Much information about the Merovingian Dynasty in the Book IV of this chronicle was unique, therefore it is very difficult to evaluate the authority of the materials in this chronicle. Bruno Krusch, a German historian, believed that the authorship of the chronicle was multiple and the authority of the text was guaranteed to some extent. Ferdinand Lot, a French historian, maintained that a single author was responsible for the chronicle and the authority of the text should be decreased. Marcel Baudot, another French historian, was optimistic about the authority of the text, and gave it a ＇romantic＇ explanation. Like many other medieval chronicles, much of the text of Chronicle of Fredegar could not be regarded reliable. However, it was irreplaceable for the study of the Frankish history.

关 键 词： 弗莱德加编年史 信度 克鲁什 洛特 博多 高法特

领　　域： [历史地理]