作　　者： ; ; ; (罗秋铃）;

机构地区： 华南师范大学

出　　处： 《心理学探新》 2015年第5期407-411,共5页

摘　　要： 为了验证直觉性逻辑的存在及其与控制性逻辑的不同,以16例三段论推理题目为材料,采用喜好判断范式评估推理中的直觉性逻辑,并探讨时间压力、任务难度对直觉性逻辑和控制性逻辑的不同影响。结果表明:喜好判断的正确率(直觉性逻辑)显著大于机会水平,但显著小于逻辑判断的正确率(控制性逻辑),时间压力和任务难度对直觉性逻辑的影响均小于对控制性逻辑的影响。上述结果表明了直觉性逻辑的存在,且在量上和质上都不同于控制性逻辑。 In order to confirm the existing of intuitive logic and the difference between intuitive logic and controlled logic, this paper tested intuitive logic by using 16 syllogistic reasoning items with a paradigm of preference judgment, and compared its responses to time pressure and task difficulty with controlled logic. The results showed that ： （ 1 ）the accuracy rate of intuitive logic was mostly higher than randomly guessing level but significantly lower than that of controlled logic; （2） time pressure and task difficulty both had a stronger in- fluence on controlled logic than on intuitive logic. These results provided a direct experimental evidence for the existing of intuitive log- ic ,which differed from controlled logic both quantitatively and qualitatively.

关 键 词： 直觉性逻辑 控制性逻辑 三段论推理 双系统理论

领　　域： [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教]