帮助 本站公告
您现在所在的位置:网站首页 > 知识中心 > 文献详情
文献详细Journal detailed

债务融资与高管薪酬:承诺还是掠夺
Debt Financing and Top-Management Compensation: Commitment or Pillage

作  者: ; ;

机构地区: 西南财经大学会计学院

出  处: 《当代财经》 2014年第7期41-51,共11页

摘  要: 以往研究认为,当公司具有财务杠杆时,股东降低高管薪酬-业绩敏感性的目的是限制高管的风险转移激励,降低债务代理成本。我们认为,这种高管薪酬-业绩敏感性的降低,其目的更可能是股东在利用债权人承担企业业绩较差时高管次优行为的成本。基于中国A股上市公司2007-2012年数据可以发现,高管薪酬-业绩敏感性与负债水平负相关,且高管薪酬粘性与负债水平正相关,很好地支持了我们的观点;而且还发现,股东在利用债权人承担高管次优行为成本的同时,鼓励高管进行风险转移,进一步掠夺了债权人的财富。 The formal researches hold that when there is financial leverage in a company, the purpose of lowering the executive pay-performance sensitivity by the shareholders is to restrict the risk transfer motivation of the executives and reduce the debt agent costs. We believe that the purpose of this kind of reducing executive pay-performance sensitivity is more likely that the shareholders are taking advantages of the creditors who are bearing the costs of the suboptimum behaviors of the executives when the corporate performance is worse. Based on the data of China's A-share listed companies during 2007-2012, it can be found that the executive pay-performance sensitivity is negatively correlated with the level of liabilities, while the stickiness of the executive compensation is positively related to the level of liabilities, which suggest that our view is well supported. It is further found that when shareholders are taking advantages of the creditors to bear the costs of the suboptirnum behaviors of the executives, they are encouraging executives to transfer risks, thus further expropriate the wealth of the creditors.

关 键 词: 债务融资 薪酬 业绩敏感性 薪酬粘性 掠夺

领  域: [经济管理] [经济管理]

相关作者

作者 骆立
作者 魏小莉
作者 禤冬杰
作者 李彭元
作者 蔡一鸣

相关机构对象

机构 暨南大学
机构 暨南大学管理学院
机构 中山大学
机构 华南理工大学
机构 华南师范大学

相关领域作者

作者 廖刚
作者 张为
作者 张丽丽
作者 张丽娟
作者 张丽娟