作　　者： ;

机构地区： 浙江大学法学院

出　　处： 《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 2001年第2期80-87,共8页

摘　　要： 行政不作为违法以现实的行政作为义务存在为前提 ,以行政主体能够履行而未履行为必要。怠于行使自由裁量作为义务的行为只要违反合理原则即构成行政不作为违法。因行政不作为违法造成相对人损害 ,只有在相对人具备公法上请求权时 ,方有可能成立国家赔偿责任。作为构成要件的因果关系 ,必须区分事实因果关系和法律因果关系分层次考察 。 Violation as administrative omission is a kind of violation with the present obligation of administrative act as its prerequisite, while the condition that administrative body can perform yet fail s to perform due obligation is its necessary requirement. When any action neglec ting to perform the obligation of discretional act violates the rule of reason, it constitutes violation as administrative omission. Only when administrative co unterpart satisfies the requirements of right to petition in public law (jus pub licum) can the damages to administrative counterpart resulting from violation as administrative omission constitute state compensation obligation. When it conce rns causality as important constructive conditions, it should be explored on two levels to achieve better understanding, namely, factual causality and legal cau sality. Furthermore, it is from the vantage of social significance to expound th e causative condition leading to the damages from violation as administrative om ission.

关 键 词： 行政不作为违法 行政作为义务 国家赔偿责任 国家赔偿法 事实因果关系 法律因果关系

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律] [政治法律] [政治法律]