作　　者： ; (邓雪薇）;

机构地区： 深圳大学师范学院

出　　处： 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第4期623-625,共3页

摘　　要： 目的探讨工读男生的防御机制和应付方式之间的关系。方法整群抽取81名工读男生作为实验组被试,94名普通中学男生作为对照组被试进行防御方式问卷与应付方式问卷测量。结果独立样本t检验发现①在防御机制问卷中,工读男生在不成熟型和中间型防御机制上的得分显著高于普通男生(t=4.47,t=3.43,P<0.01);②在应付方式问卷中,工读男生在幻想,退避和合理化上的得分显著高于普通男生(t=2.71,P<0.01;t=2.10,P<0.05;t=2.53,P<0.05);③Pearson相关分析发现工读男生的不成熟型防御机制与自责,幻想和合理化成显著正相关(r=0.30,r=0.25,r=0.23;P<0.01);工读男生的不成熟型,成熟型和中间型防御机制均与求助成显著负相关(r=-0.28,P<0.05;r=-0.25,P<0.01;r=-0.32,P<0.01)。结论工读男生比普通男生更多的使用不成熟型和中间型防御机制;工读男生的应付方式是以幻想-退避为主的不成熟应付方式;且其不成熟的应付方式与不成熟型防御机制相互联系。 Objective To explore the relationships between defense mechanisms and coping style of male reformatory students. Methods A total of 81 male reformatory student（ the experiment group）and 94 male normal students（ the control group）were assessed with the Defense Style Questionnaire and Coping Style questionnaire. Results （1）The experimental group had significantly higher scores of immature and neurotic mechanism than the control group. （2） In the coping style, the scores of the illusion, withdraw, and rationalization were obviously higher in the experimental group than in the control group. （3） The scores of immature mechanism had obviously positive correlation with the illusion, self-accusation and rationalization of coping style （r = 0. 30,0. 25 ,0. 23 ;P 〈 0.01 ）, and the recourse had ob- viously negative correlations with the immature, neurotic and mature mechanism （ r = -0.25, -0.25, -0.32 ; P 〈 0.01 ）. Conchtsion Male reformatory students use the immature and neurotic mechanism more than male normal students, and they often adapt the immature coping style such as illusion and withdraw when they encounter things, what＇s more, there is closed relationship between the immature defense mechanism and the immature coping styles.

关 键 词： 防御机制 应付方式 工读男生 社会心理学

领　　域： [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教] [经济管理] [社会学]