作　　者： ; ; ; ;

机构地区： 广州大学土木工程学院工程抗震研究中心

出　　处： 《地震工程与工程振动》 2013年第5期232-240,共9页

摘　　要： 目前隔震支座拉压刚度比的不同取值是否影响隔震结构性能,实际工程隔震设计时选取多大的拉压刚度比才能不影响隔震设计结果,这些问题还没有完全搞清楚.为此,本文选取一RC框架高层隔震结构作为分析对象,考虑隔震支座拉压刚度比的不同取值,对其动力特性、地震反应特性及拉压应力情况进行了对比分析.结果表明,拉压刚度比的不同取值对结构自振周期、顶层加速度及极大压应力的影响幅度较小,但对隔震结构上部楼层剪力、层间位移角及拉应力验算的影响较大,进而可能造成过高或过低地估计上部结构减震系数,给结构造成安全隐患.综合考虑各项参数后,建议在实际开展隔震设计时采用拉压刚度比1/8 ～1/10. It is not completely clarified that whether different ratios of tensile and compressive stiffness of isolators would affect the performance of isolated structure. How to select the ratio of tensile and compressive stiffness of iso- lators in actual project isolation design so as not to affect the results of isolation design is also not completely clari- fied. For these reasons,a high-rise isolated RC frame structure is selected in the paper as an example, considering the different ratios of tensile and compressive stiffness, the dynamic characteristics, the seismic responses the of the isolated structure and tensile stress and compressive stress of the isolators are compared. These results show that the different ratios of tensile and compressive stiffness have little effect on the structure natural vibration period and the acceleration of the top floor, but have greate effect on the story shears, story drifts of upper floors and the tensile stress checking, and it may result in overestimating or underestimating the horizontal isolation effect, which would cause some dangers to the isolated structure, considering many factors,the 1/8 - 1/10 ratio of pulling and pushing stiffness is is advised in the actual isolation design.

关 键 词： 隔震支座单元 单元 并联 拉压刚度 时程分析

领　　域： [建筑科学] [天文地球] [天文地球] [天文地球]