作　　者： ;

机构地区： 华南师范大学政治与行政学院

出　　处： 《哲学研究》 2013年第9期53-58,67,共7页

摘　　要： 荀子的性朴论早已被后人遗忘，但是，在汉代仍然有人坚持它，大名鼎鼎的董仲舒就是如此。董仲舒继承了苟子的性朴论，并凸显了性中善的潜质，比较温和地批评了孟子的性善论，与《性恶》的作者明显不同。刘念亲在20世纪初就认为《性恶》出自苟子后学之手（见刘念亲），而笔者提出了更多的证据表明这一点（见周炽成，第17—36页）。把董仲舒对孟子性善论的批评与《性恶》的作者对它的批评联系起来考察，会得出一些令人意想不到的结论。 As the theorists of simple and naive human nature,Dong Zhong-shu and Xun Zi are different from the theorists of good human nature and those of evil human nature.According to Dong,there is good potentials in human nature,but it dose not mean that human nature is perfectly good.He inherited Xun Zi's doctrine of simple and naive human nature,and emphasized good potentials in human nature.Dong's criticism of Meng Zi's doctrine of good human nature is mild,while that of the author of the article 'Human Nature Is Evil' is radical.It is inconceivable that if Dong read this article,but he did not mention it.It is natural that mild criticism of a doctrine is the first and the criticism of it is the second.That Dong did not read the article is supported by the fact the Si Ma-qian and Han Ying did not read it too.There is a series of evidences to show that the article was not finished by the middle of Western Han Dynasty.

关 键 词： 董仲舒 继承 荀子 世纪 性善论 批评 性恶 苟子

领　　域： [哲学宗教]