作　　者： ; ; ; ; ;

机构地区： 华南师范大学教育科学学院心理应用研究中心

出　　处： 《心理学探新》 2013年第4期315-321,共7页

摘　　要： 归纳推理的多样性效应是指人们在归纳推理中倾向于寻找更加多样的证据来支持所要得出的结论。然而,儿童在归纳推理中是否具有多样性效应争议不断。目前,关于这一问题的研究主要采用四种范式:判断力度迫选法,属性扩展法,寻找证据法和归属法。通过对这四种方法的本质特点和优缺点进行概括和总结,以期为未来这一争议的解决提供参考。 According to the diversity effects, people draw stronger inferences from a diverse set of premise than from a homogenous set of promises. Researchers agreed on the point of view that adults are able to use the diversity strategy in inductive reasoning. However, the question whether children have diversity effects in induction remains controversial. There are four research methods used in diversity effects of inductive reasoning in young children ： forced - choice argument strength paradigm, property - extended paradigm, data selec- tion paradigm and identification paradigm. Therefore, the main goal of this review is to compare the four research paradigms and to find out their advantage and disadvantage.

关 键 词： 儿童 归纳推理 多样性效应 实验范式

领　　域： [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教]