作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 中山大学地理科学与规划学院城市与区域研究中心

出　　处： 《地理科学进展》 2013年第8期1177-1186,共10页

摘　　要： 20世纪80年代以来",世界城市"成为城市研究领域的热点话题。在迄今30年的研究过程中,2000年前后发生的针对世界城市经典理论的两场学术争论具有里程碑意义:①关于世界城市发展动力和类型的争论;②关于世界城市发展历史的争论。通过争论,凝聚了学界共识,引发了本研究领域逐步从论证经济全球化对城市重构的作用转向讨论城市全球化的多样路径。两场争论之后,"世界城市政治"和"世界城市历史"的讨论成为新世纪两个重要的研究方向。本文回顾了经典世界城市理论以及对其的早期批评,详细介绍了两场争论及其引发的两种研究方向,并在此基础上提出了对中国世界城市研究的启示。 This paper provides a review on the progress of world city research in the past 30 years. It attempts to argue that, in the 21 st century, the focus of world city literature has shifted from proving the links between eco- nomic globalization and urban restructuring to revealing different pathways in world city formation. Two de- bates took place around 2000 have become turning points in the academic trajectory： （1） debate on world city types and driving forces led by Hill and Kim; （2） debate on world city history led by Abu-Lughod. This paper is organized into three sections. First, it briefly reviews the classical theories alongside with some early criticisms. In the 1980s, the world city theories founded by Friedmann and Sassen have caused a paradigm shift in urban studies. Cities have been seen as basing points of the new international division of labor. Although the classical theories are still the foundation of current research, scholars have criticized them for overemphasizing the eco- nomic factors, exaggerating the generality of New York model and neglecting historical analysis. Because of lacking solid empirical bases, these early criticisms have not challenged the classical theories radically. Second- ly, it introduces the two debates and two following trends in detail. Based on the study of Tokyo and Seoul, Hill and Kim have led the first debate. As the important role of developmental state, they designated the two Asian cities as state-centred global cities, which were in sharp contrast to the market-certred ones, such as New York and London. Friedmann and Sassen have responds to their arguments and admitted that, the classical theories ne- glected the role of state. The second debate is about history of world cities. Through investigating the evolution of three American cities in a long-term, Abu-Lughod has explored their unique responses, called ＂personality＂, to globalization. Her historical-comparative method has opened up an important new theoretical perspective and aroused interest

关 键 词： 世界城市 历史 比较方法 世界城市政治 动力 类型

领　　域： [建筑科学]