作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 北京师范大学

出　　处： 《铁道警官高等专科学校学报》 2013年第4期64-70,共7页

摘　　要： 欧洲人权法院对于非法证据的处理与英美法系国家迥然不同。欧洲人权法院并没有就如何排除非法证据制定系列指导性的纲要,而是采取个案中具体考量的办法,重点考察公权力人员的非法取证行为是否给整个诉讼程序造成不公,以及获取证据与案件关联性的有无及强弱,在此基础上决定证据排除与否。 European Court of Human Rights has its own characteristics as for the treatment of illegal evidence, which is different from Anglo - American countries. European Court of Human Rights doesn＇ t make a series of guiding outlines with reference to the exclusion of the evidence obtained illegally ; however, it adopts an approach of considering case-by-case, which attaches much importance to the two key factors： the fairness of procedure as a whole and the relevance of evidence. On the basis of that, the judges are determined whether the evidence obtained illegally are excluded or not.

关 键 词： 关联性 可采性 非法证据 衍生证据 隐私权

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]