作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学人文科学学院哲学系

出　　处： 《北京行政学院学报》 2013年第4期124-128,共5页

摘　　要： 关于利玛窦最负盛名的著作《天主实义》的成书过程,虽前辈学人撰文多有发明,然众说纷纭,未有定论。另外,此书与同时期其他几部相关著作的关系,并未得到清晰的阐明。本文即在前人研究的基础上,进一步探讨上述问题。详细的文本分析显示,《天主实义》在结构和内容上多有因袭罗明坚《新编西竺国天主实录》和范礼安的《日本教理手册》,特别是可能属于初稿的前四篇的大部分章节。另外,本文亦根据《利玛窦中国传教史》和《利玛窦书信集》及其他相关记载,考辨诸多章节可能的写作时间和契机,附带论及《天主实义》和利氏晚年所编辑《要理问答》之间的关系。 Despite a lot of articles having been written on the composing of Matteo Ricci＇ s The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven, the scholars have never reached a consensus on this topic. On the other hand, the relationship of this book and some other related books in the same period has also never been clearly explained. These are the subjects this article addresses. Detailed textual analysis shows that, The True Meaning of the Lord of Heavenhad borrowed a lot from Michele Ruggieri＇ sThe True Record Of the Lord of Heaven and Alessandro Valignano＇ s Catechismus Christianae Fideiin respect of both structure and content, especially in the first four chapters which might belong to the first draft of it. Furthermore, based on some related historical records, this article discusses the composing time and motivation of many chapters of The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven, and also the relationship of this book and The Catechism composed by Ricci in his last years.

关 键 词： 利玛窦 天主实义 明末天主教

领　　域： [历史地理] [历史地理]