机构地区: 天津体育学院健康与运动科学系
出 处: 《天津体育学院学报》 2013年第3期189-192,共4页
摘 要: 通过2个试验检验思维抑制与思维表达对运动员自控损耗的影响。30名篮球专项大学生参与试验1,29名足球专项大学生参与试验2,被随机分配到思维抑制、思维表达以及控制组中。经过5 min的思维控制后,试验1的参与者完成Stroop任务,试验2的参与者完成Visual-CCPT任务。结果发现:思维抑制组较控制组在Stroop不匹配任务上出现更多的错误,思维抑制组较思维表达组和控制组在Visual-CCPT任务上出现更多的虚报。表明思维抑制较思维表达更"费力",进而会损耗更多的自控能量;提示应多提示运动员想什么,而不是不应该想什么来进行思维调节。 Two experiments were conducted to test effects of thought suppression and thought expression on athletes' ego-depletion. Thirty basketball collegiate students participated in Experiment 1, 29 football collegiate students participated in Experiment 2. They were randomly allocated to (a) thought suppression group, (b) thought expression group, and (c) the control group. After 5 minutes of thought control task, and then participates in Experiment 1 finished the Stroop task, participates in Experiment 2 finished the Visual-CCPT task. MANOVA showed that different thought control group has no significant difference on Stroop task, but the thinking-suppression group's error number of incongruent Stroop task is higher than control group; thought suppression group has more commission numbers than thought expression group and control group. These results suggested that thought suppression is more difficult than thought expression, may consume more self-control energy. Athletes should use thought expression (e.g. think something) strategy to regulate their thought.