作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东商学院法学院

出　　处： 《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》 2013年第4期41-45,共5页

摘　　要： 我国《民事诉讼法》明确地规定了"电子数据"为法定独立的证据形式,肯定了电子数据在民事诉讼活动中的证据能力和法律地位,然而并未对其认定规则作出详细规定,从而导致在认定方面存在较大的分歧。对于电子数据的认定,应当适用《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》中对证据审查认定的一般性规定,同时也应当针对电子数据的独特性作出特殊性规定,肯定CA认证、EDI中心、DRM、数字签名和时间戳等新型收集手段的合法性、变更对其原件的要求、肯定单一电子数据的证明力、明确数个电子数据证明同一事实时各电子数据证明力大小的认定原则。 ＂Electronic data＂ is defined clearly as an independent evidence by the civil procedure law in China. That means electronic data has credibility and legal status in civil lawsuit. However, for no detailed rule of affirmation, its affirmation is disputed by many scholars. The correct approach is not only using the rule of evidence confirmed by ＊＇several rules of evidence in civil action of the Supreme Court＂, but also creating some special rules on the spe- cifics of electronic data, such as endowing new collecting methods （Certificate Authority, Electronic Data Inter change, Digital Rights Management, digital signature and timestamp... ） with legality, altering the requirement of original copy, making sure the probative force of alone electronic data, and distinguishing the probative force of each one when some electronic data proves the same fact.

关 键 词： 电子数据 证据 证据能力 证明力

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]