作　　者： ; ; ;

机构地区： 广西民族大学管理学院

出　　处： 《公共行政评论》 2013年第3期101-126,168-169,共26页

摘　　要： 在当前对中国政策参与的研究中,网络对政策参与的影响渐受重视。文章结合中国的经验和已有研究,根据议程的提出者和制度化程度提出网络参与影响政策议程设置的三种模式:外压模式(网络偶发事件模式)、动员模式(专题型网络问政)和上书模式(留言板型网络问政)。上述模式中的留言版型网络问政的制度化水平较高,蕴含着政府和民众在政策参与上的地位的进一步平等化,显现出现有中国制度条件下网络影响政策参与的基本途径。研究对广东省惠州市网络问政平台的网民留言和政府政策输出的分析,发现网民留言对政府政策输出的影响在数量上逐渐增加,但也表现出制度化之下的一个悖论:民众提出初步议题转化为政策的比例在增加,同时,回应内容相关性在持续下降。这可能预示着留言版型网络参与下的政策参与和政府回应存在"选择性回应"。"选择性回应"符合以往对中国地方政府行为逻辑的解释,预示中国的制度环境仍然是影响政策输出的重要原因。 There is an increasing amount of interest in the impact of Internet on agenda setting in China . The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of online platform on agenda setting in a local government (Huizhou) in Guangdong Province. According to proposes and degree of institutional,we propose the following three network participation patterns are: external pressure model (accidental events model) , mobilization model (project type online platform model) and the submit model (message board online platform model) . The results show that the online platform model not only impacts how different issues are received initially by government,but also the internal process of agenda setting in government. These results seem to provide some evidence (at least in this case) to suggest that citizens have started to get more involved in setting government agenda in China. This study also shows an interesting puzzle that while the amount of issues accepted by government in agenda setting has increased,however, government seems to follow a pattern of selective responses to these issues. While additional research should explore the cause and impact of selective responses,this study concludes with some suggestions for future research.

关 键 词： 选择性回应 网络问政 公众参与 地方政府行为

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]