作　　者： ;

机构地区： 北京航空航天大学

出　　处： 《中国外语》 2013年第2期25-33,共9页

摘　　要： 本文发现,绝大多数关于运动事件的研究存在研究范围和方法论的不当,具体为:(1)研究过度集中在对物理性位移运动事件的研究。误以为Talmy的理论是在对物理性位移运动事件研究中提出来的。因此,验证该理论仅需要在该类事件中进行。(2)研究缺乏统一的科学方法论。误以为Talmy的理论在方法论上是开放的。本文指出:(1)物理性位移运动事件仅仅是运动事件的两大组成部分之一。(2)运动事件仅仅是宏事件的五个组成部分之一;目前少有研究涉及物理性位移运动事件之外的内容。(3)Talmy对宏事件的研究遵循严格的方法论,即语料的"口语化、高频率、普遍性"。 This article argues that there generally exist two types of errors in macro-event research concerning research scope and methodology as follows： First, Talmy had based his dichotomy of verb-framed and satellite-framed languages solely on motion events, with the result that tests of his framework have been limited to treating motion events only; Second, Talmy had used a permissive methodology open to any form of data. This article concludes that： First, Talmy based his dichotomy not on the motion event but on the ＂macro-event＂, which-includes five different types of event （a motion event is only one of these）. Moreover, motion events for Talmy cover an extensive range of variations, but the research of others has addressed only a small subset of these. Second, Talmy has strict methodological requirements on this type of research concerning colloquial in style, frequency in use and pervasiveness. This article discusses these issues and proposes a solution to ascertain the typological status of a language.

关 键 词： 运动事件 宏事件 动词框架语言 卫星框架语言 语言类型学

领　　域： [语言文字]