帮助 本站公告
您现在所在的位置:网站首页 > 知识中心 > 文献详情
文献详细Journal detailed

停罢科举后的特科余绪
On the Remaining of Teke After the Abolishment of Imperial Examination

作  者: ;

机构地区: 中山大学人文科学学院历史系

出  处: 《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第2期106-111,共6页

摘  要: 1905年清廷宣布立停科举,主要针对常科,并未触及恩科与特科。随着各省学堂的兴办、扩展及西学风行、儒学衰微,不断有人呼吁举办制科,借此保存国粹。清廷批准开科后,博学鸿词科因故未能落实,孝廉方正则在宣统年间两度开科,其初虽以德行、孝道为推荐的依据,而后却据考试成绩与报考者原有旧学功名分等录用,未见有挽回中学颓势的功效,却实际成为停罢科举后疏通旧学士子的一项善后措施。 The abolishment of imperial examination, the traditional Chinese examination system, in 1905 didn't include Enke and Teke. With the new schools appearing and spreading in many provinces, the western style of schooling became the dominant and the traditional style declined. Thus, many peo- ple call for the recovery of Zhike to inherit Chinese tradition. With the permission of the Qing emperor, two types of examinations named Boxuehongci and Xiaolianfangzheng was proposed. Although the ex- amination of Boxuehongci was not brought into practice for some reasons, the examination of Xiaolian- fangzheng was put into practice twice during the Xuantong Period (1908-1911). At first, the candidates' virtue and filial piety were the only criteria of assessment. Gradually, the scores of exams and the past exam records of candidates took place. Thus, the recovery of Zhike failed to save traditional Chinese ed- ucation system. Nevertheless, it did work as a rehabilitative measure for those students and scholars ed- ucated in traditional Chinese education system.

关 键 词: 停罢科举 特科 博学鸿词 孝廉方正

领  域: [历史地理] [历史地理]

相关作者

作者 高喜平
作者 郭玉华
作者 徐臻
作者 梁姗姗
作者 陈从乐

相关机构对象

机构 中山大学人文科学学院历史系
机构 香港中文大学
机构 中山大学人文科学学院中文系
机构 广东省社会科学院
机构 暨南大学

相关领域作者

作者 徐佳宁
作者 曾彧
作者 杨卫华
作者 欧阳娟
作者 武小平