作　　者： ;

机构地区： 清华大学新闻与传播学院

出　　处： 《新闻与传播研究》 2013年第1期37-50,126-127,共14页

摘　　要： 近些年来,部分传统媒体自觉发展成为"调停者",它们的策略性框架过程,有助于促成官方舆论与民间舆论的互动,形成"框架整合"的局面,并在一定程度影响社会抗争事件的政策回应。本文选取了发生于2007年至2009年的6个中国都市环境维权抗争案例,依据其是否引起政策回应进行分类并加以对比。在其中,3个案例引起了政策回应,而另3个案例则相反。我们发现,由传统媒体主导的框架整合过程是一个关键性变量,它在很大程度上决定了维权案例的结果。我们认为,框架整合过程能否形成,取决于媒体的报道数量和报道框架。在某些成功的案例当中,传统媒体通过频密的报道和巧妙的框架策略,消除了民间和官方的对立框架,使得民间抗争者的诉求可能为政府接纳,并最终带来政策的回应。在社会矛盾频发且公共意见市场趋于分裂的语境下,传统媒体的能动角色及其社会影响,可能是培养社会对话,完善社会治理,促成"和谐社会"的一种可选路径。 In recent years,some members of the traditional media have consciously developed into the role of 'mediators'.Their strategic framing process,which has helped facilitate interactions between official and public opinion,has led to the formation of a 'frame alignment process' and to a certain extent has influenced policy outcomes of social protests.This article selects nine cases as examples of Chinese urban environment rights protection protests from 2007 - 2009,classifying and comparing them based on whether or not the protests led to policy response.Of the nine cases,six led to policy responses,while three did not.We found that,as the traditional media-led frame alignment process was a key variable, the media to a large degree determined the outcomes of rights protection cases.In some of the successful cases,traditional media used framing strategies,such as highlighting,filtering,revising and diluting to eliminate an antagonistic frame process between the public and government officials,making the protesters' demands acceptable to the government and eventually leading to policy response.In the context of frequent societal conflict and a fractured public marketplace of ideas,traditional media' s active role and social impact may provide a possible path to fostering social dialogue,improving social governance and helping facilitate a 'harmonious society'.

关 键 词： 框架整合 环境维权抗争 官方舆论 民间舆论 政策回应

领　　域： [文化科学]