作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 广东培正学院法律学系

出　　处： 《广东培正学院学报》 2009年第4期28-31,共4页

摘　　要： ＂精神损害赔偿制度只能存在于侵权行为中＂一直是许多国家传统民法学理论的一般原则。但随着实践的发展,人们对精神上的权益越来越重视,单纯从侵权角度来进行精神损害赔偿已经不能满足现代社会的需求了。本文专门从精神损害赔偿概念的界定、学术界对违约之精神损害赔偿的争论以及我国现行法对精神损害赔偿的立场等几个方面,探讨了违约之精神损害赔偿的可行性,认为：在特定情形之下,对于违约之精神损害是可以并且应予以赔偿的。 ＂The compensation system for mental damage only exists in right rioting behaviors＂ has been a general principle of conventional civil law theory in many countries. However, with the practical developm, ent, people have attached greater importance to the mental rights. Handling mental damage compen.~ation merely from a right rioting perspective can not satisfy the current social demands. This article particularly explores the feasibility of compensation for＇mental damage caused by contract breaching in the aspects of defining mental damage compensation, the debate of compensation for mental damage cansed by contract breaching in academic circle, and China＇ s current decrees＇ standpoint to the mental damage compensation. It believes that mental can and should be compensated under certain circumstances. damage caused by contract breaching

关 键 词： 精神损害 精神损害赔偿 违约责任 侵权责任

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]