作　　者： ; ; ;

机构地区： 郑州大学建筑学院

出　　处： 《地理研究》 2012年第11期2080-2093,共14页

摘　　要： 城镇保障性住房制度直接塑造了保障性住区,这一"国家化"的社会空间在不同的城市呈现出迥异的类型。通过梳理城镇保障房制度的演变及在广州的实施,将广州的保障性住区分为四类:1986～1998年建成的承接单位体制内住房困难户的住区、1999～2005年建成的承载党政机关和教医系统住房困难家庭的住区、2006年后新建的主要承载具有城市户籍的社会双困群体的住区、建设历程跨越多制度阶段的承载多类保障群体的综合住区;通过"典型案例"研究,各类保障住区的现状社会空间可归纳为:"类西方‘社会型’公共住区的极度贫困均质空间"、"介于中国城市普遍存在的贫困集聚区的‘贫困混杂空间’和西方混合社区的‘有序混合空间’之间但混杂性高的贫困空间"、"介于两者之间但有序性强的混合空间"、"类商品房住区"的均质非贫困空间。 Chinese urban indemnificatory tory communities. These national social housing system has a direct effect on indemnificaspaces presented different types in different areas. This article, taking Guangzhou as the research area, divides Guangzhou＇s indemnificatory communities constructed since 1986 into four types by teasing the evolvement and implement of indemnificatory system in Guangzhou： the communities built from 1986 to 1998 which accommodated those families living in poor conditions from their workplaces, the communities built from 1999 to 2005 where those families with poor living conditions from Party ＆ government organizations and educational ＆ medical system dwelt, newly-built communities after 2006 which carried those low-income families with poor living conditions and Guangzhou＇s urban Hukou, the communities whose construction went through every stage and which carried the families from more types. The author applied ＂ typical-research＂ to analyze every type＇s evolving path as well as sociospatial characteristics. Those characteristics were concluded as follows： hell-fired poverty and homogeneous space similar to western social public settlements under the free-welfare system （excluding the racial segregation）, poverty space which falls in between the poor ＆ heterogeneous space from Chinese urban ubiquitous poverty-centralized areas and mixed-and-ordered space from the western mixed-community but more heterogeneous, mixed space which falls in between the two but more ordered, non-poverty space similar to commercial communities.

关 键 词： 城镇保障性住房制度 保障性住区 社会空间特征 广州

领　　域： [建筑科学]