作　　者： ;

机构地区： 苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处： 《法制与社会发展》 2012年第6期96-111,共16页

摘　　要： 根据犯罪构成要件的内容或者位阶的不同,主张构建不同的犯罪构成论体系,属于结构合理主义的理论观点,无助于解决实际问题。以事实与价值二元论为基础构建的事实论体系与价值论体系、存在论体系与规范论体系,割裂事实与价值的内在联系,存在诸多缺陷。以事实与价值一元论为基础构建的一元论评价体系,主张事实判断与价值评价辩证统一,具有内在合理性:能够避免客观归责与主观认罪;事实判断与价值评价虽混融但脉络清晰;能够充分说明事实判断与价值评价的内在联系。犯罪构成要件的位阶不影响行为定性。社会危害性理论在犯罪构成论体系中处于核心地位。排除犯罪性事由不构成犯罪是因为没有侵犯犯罪客体。 Constructing different theory systems of crime constitution according to the difference of the content or the rank of the requisites to constitute a crime, this belongs to theoretical perspectives of the struc tural rationalism and is helpless in solving practical problems. Dualist theory of crime constitution establisheson the foundation of fact or value and concludes realism theory system, axiology theory system, ontology system and normative theory system and so on. All of these theory systems split the relationship between fact and val ue and lets to many defects. Based on the monism of fact and value, monist theory of crime constitution advo cates dialectical unity of factual judgment and value evaluation. To avoid the objective imputation and the sub jective guilty, to be able to adequately describe the intrinsic link between the fact judgment and value evalua tion and to integrate and clarify factual judgment and value evaluation are the advantages of monist evaluation system of composition of crime. It is unnecessary to seat arrangement among constitutive elements of a crime because this does not affect cognizance of a crime. The theory of social harmfulness is able to reveal the intrin sic link among the fact judgment, value evaluation and crime, so it is at the core of theory system of crime constitution. Object of a crime should include legal relationship. Reasons to remove criminality do not consti- tute a crime is due to meet specific legal relationship, so it does not violate object of a crime.

关 键 词： 犯罪论体系 事实判断 价值评价 二元论体系 一元论体系

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]