作　　者： ;

机构地区： 苏州大学社会学院

出　　处： 《档案学研究》 2012年第5期30-34,共5页

摘　　要： 现行《中华人民共和国档案法》带有明显的上世纪八十年代初的法律印记和价值认知。其立法定位偏向于档案管理而非档案开放与利用,这有《档案法》第三章与第四章的结构与条文数量为证;《档案法》规定的国家管理的档案范围或曰法定档案的范围过于泛化,将并不完全适合融于此范围的"集体所有的和个人所有的对国家和社会有保存价值"的档案也一并纳入了《档案法》的调整范围,一定程度上反映了早期立法过于宽泛的倾向。将《档案法》的法律性质定位在行政法大概念下的单行法,而非法学界业内人士普遍认可或多数主张的社会信息法领域的主干法律之一。笔者以为,在第二轮《档案法》修改时,这些问题应予优先考虑。 The current Archives Law of the People＇s Republic of China shows the obvious legal mark of the early 1980＇s and value cognition. Its legal position focused on archives management not on archive opening-up and utilization, which was proved by the structure and the number of the articles in Chapter Three and Chapter Four of Archives Law. The law over extended the nation＇s managing scope on archives or the scope of legal archives. And the law brought some archives which were not completely suitable to that scope to the adjustment of Archives Law, such as the archives which were valuable to preserve for the nation and the society owned by the collectivity and the individual. To some extent, it expressed the early legislation over extended. Someone identified the legal nature of Archives Law as the slip law of the administrative law but not one of the main laws of the social information laws that were approved by the scholars in the law circle. Therefore, on the author＇s opinion, these problems should be considered priorly in the second-round revision of Archives Law.

关 键 词： 中华人民共和国档案法 档案立法 社会信息法 法定档案 档案信息利用权 档案开放

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]