作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中国政法大学民商经济法学院

出　　处： 《江南社会学院学报》 2012年第2期68-72,共5页

摘　　要： 物权与债权的区分是德意志法系最具特色的制度特征之一,由于物权和债权的不同特性,由此也衍生出了各具特色的规则。其中,物权行为和债权行为的区分即为著例。物权行为制度自其诞生之日起就饱受争议。改革开放后,随着我国民法学的复苏,在民法的制定过程中,学者们对物权行为的态度也各执一词。《物权法》的颁布似乎对物权行为制度的引进与否作出了回答,但实际情况并非如此,仍需对这一重要问题进行理论探讨。 The separation of real right and creditors＇ right is one of the most distinctive system. There exist various rules owing to the different characteristics of real right features of the German law and creditors＇ right. The difference between juristic act of real right and creditors＇ right is one important example. With the resurgence of theory of civil law in our country since reform and opening-up, scholars＇ views about juristic act are quite divided. The enactment of Law on Real Right seems to have given an answer, but it does not indeed. Theoretical studies of the issue are still of necessity.

关 键 词： 物权行为 理论争议 动产物权 不动产物权

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]